---
# System prepended metadata

title: MyMeta Roadmap Notes
tags: [Roadmap, MetaGame, MyMeta]

---

###### tags: `MetaGame` `Roadmap` `MyMeta`

# MyMeta Roadmap Notes

[TOC]

Meeting between Alec, Peth, and Michiel to discuss the roadmap for MyMeta and what to focus on moving forward with the product. Bacon also in attendence. 

## Who is the main customer?
Users vs. DAOs
### DAOs
*    Serveral DAOs already interested
*    Easy to collect specs
*    Conversation intiated by HBesso recommending other DAOs that are interested

### Users
* Which users?
* How would we collect specs/wants/needs?

#### Focus on DAOs for now
Peth will be reaching out to interested DAOs. 

## Current Architecture
* Ceramic is used for profiles
* Everything else is incorporated into the "MetaGame implementation" all one repo. 

Tecnically there are/should be three layers:
* User Profile
* DAO Custom Frontend
* Middle layer that handles data collection/writing to profiles
    * Currently in MetaGame we use Hastura graphs and pull custom xp/seed data from our Sourcecred instance. Other DAOs will want to use other systems. 

## Forking Code for DAOs
Sourcecode needs to be implemented such that DAOs can fork for their own instance/use.
Ex. DAOhouse tracking shares vs. MetaGame tracking xp/seed

Code needs to be split. Current user focused code stays in current repo, DAO focused code moved to new, easy to fork repo. 

Currently it's a huge/difficult effort for DAOs to "spin-up" their own instance. Work needs to be done to streamline and document this. Need to create modular resusable packages. 

Biggest hurtle is plan/architecture design. A good layout goes a long way. 

### Data/Profile
Should be decentralized via ceramic. Shared data for user profiles independant of DAO implementation/stack. 


## Priorities
Limited Dev time so need to prioritize. 

Get details/interest from DAOs to decide what to focus on. 

DAOHouse/GitCoin highest impact potential partners.

Aragon is also interested. Also high leverage/impact. Might start with them. 

Prepare script to reach out to various DAOs. - MyMeta Elevator pitch.

MetaGame will always be community needs driven. MetaGame is more than MyMeta; MetaGame is a community and MyMeta is just one product it offers. 

MetaGame currently lacks the follow-through to support a production level project however. This may be because payouts aren't high enough to merit such focus from players, but there are likely larger issues as well. One potential idea is to have seed "staking" where if you say you're going to do something you stake your seeds on it. 

### Free vs. Paid Features?
Debating how/if this should be done and how we collect fees needed for ongoing maintenance/development. 

## Next Steps
Peth will reach out to DAOs
* DAOHouse
* GitCoin

Michiel will reach out to Aragon. He's also going to work on developing the elevator pitch to these DAOs/create a framework for the discussion. 

Calls will be set-up to coordinate on the requirements they have for the product. Seperate call for each DAO. 