---
# System prepended metadata

title: Untitled

---

The Minneapolis ICE Shootings: A Deepening Crisis in Federal Enforcement
"Escalating Federal Encounters in Minneapolis

In early 2026, Minneapolis became the focal point of intense national scrutiny after a series of shootings involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal law enforcement agents. These incidents occurred against the backdrop of Operation Metro Surge, a large-scale federal immigration enforcement operation launched in December 2025, which deployed thousands of ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to the city and surrounding areas. The goal of the operation was to intensify immigration enforcement in a jurisdiction perceived by federal authorities as insufficiently cooperative with detainers, arrests, and deportations. However, the surge sparked fierce controversy, as what began as an enforcement effort quickly devolved into public outrage and calls for accountability after multiple confrontations ended in shootings that shook the community.

The Killing of Renée Nicole Good

The first and most consequential of the Minneapolis ICE shootings occurred on January 7, 2026, when Renée Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen, was fatally shot by an ICE agent during an enforcement action in south Minneapolis. According to federal accounts, Good’s vehicle attempted to “ram” agents during a traffic stop, leading the ICE officer, later identified as Jonathan Ross, to fire his weapon. However, multiple eyewitness accounts and video footage contradict the federal narrative, with local officials, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, rejecting claims that the shooting was justified self-defense. Mayor Frey described the federal account as “bullshit” after viewing available video, and state authorities have pushed for independent investigation into the use of force.

The controversial circumstances of Good’s death spurred widespread public outcry and protests in Minneapolis and beyond. State and local leaders called for federal transparency and accountability, with some demanding access to investigative materials that were initially controlled exclusively by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Even with state prosecutors advocating for independent review, the FBI’s sole leadership of the federal investigation raised concerns among officials about oversight and transparency.

Additional Shootings and Confrontations

Less than a week after Good’s death, federal agents were involved in another incident on January 14, 2026, in north Minneapolis, in which a Venezuelan man, Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, was shot in the leg during a confrontation with ICE personnel. Federal authorities claimed the shooting occurred after an altercation that involved objects being used against agents, necessitating self-defensive actions. Contradictory video evidence and family testimony cast doubt on aspects of the official narrative, illustrating the chaotic environment that had taken hold across the city.

The situation escalated further on January 24, 2026, when another federal enforcement encounter resulted in the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse and Minneapolis resident. Federal officials asserted that Pretti approached agents with a handgun, prompting defensive force. However, independent video analysis, eyewitness accounts, and protests challenged that depiction, suggesting that Pretti was observing agents with his phone and was not posing an imminent threat when he was shot multiple times. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner officially ruled his death a homicide.

Community Impact and Political Backlash

The cumulative toll of these shootings reverberated throughout Minneapolis and across the nation. What had been framed by the federal government as an immigration enforcement mission instead became a flashpoint over use of force, federal versus local control, and civil liberties. Local leaders, including Mayor Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, criticized the aggressive <a href="https://www.orbitbrief.com/2026/01/31/nationwide-walkouts-minneapolis-ice-shootings-3000-agents/">Minneapolis ICE shootings</a> deployment of federal agents, arguing that it contributed to fear and instability rather than enhancing public safety. Community members and advocates staged protests, vigils, and calls for ICE’s withdrawal from the city, asserting that federal tactics were overly militarized and lacked accountability.

In response to mounting backlash and pressure, federal officials announced a reduction in the number of ICE and CBP personnel in Minneapolis. Border Czar Tom Homan stated that around 700 agents would be pulled out of the operation, citing increased cooperation from local law enforcement as part of the justification for scaling back. Despite this shift, approximately 2,000 federal officers remained.

Broader Questions of Accountability and Oversight

The Minneapolis ICE shootings have raised profound questions about federal enforcement policy and civil rights. Critics argue that federal agencies acted with too much autonomy and too little transparency, especially when state investigators were barred from access to critical evidence early in the inquiries. Legal and civil rights groups have called for third-party investigations and independent oversight to ensure that actions taken by ICE and allied federal agencies are subject to appropriate scrutiny. Supporters of the federal response, meanwhile, emphasize the challenges faced by officers operating in high pressure situations and defend the overall mission to enforce immigration laws.

As Minneapolis continues to grapple with the fallout from these events, the incidents have become emblematic of larger national debates over immigration enforcement, police powers, federal authority, and community trust. The consequences of these shootings — both for the victims’ families and for the city at large — are likely to shape policy discussions well beyond Minnesota’s borders in the months and years ahead"