# lab sequential -- serial2parallel comparing resource --- - HLS ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/ByeDoHIo6h.png) - Verilog ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/Bknnr8ja2.png) comparing timing --- - HLS - timing constraint ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/Hys3LIiT2.png) - timing report ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/rJ5mD8oan.png) - Verilog - timing constraint ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/H1vEv8ip2.png) - timing report ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/rJVSwUsah.png) comparing waveform --- - HLS ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/HJcTwUjTh.png) - Verilog ![](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/BkwAPUi6n.png) key point --- 1. It can be seen that the resource usage is less when writing in Verilog, and the number of flip-flops used can be accurately assessed through the Verilog code. This is unlike HLS, where it's difficult to directly determine the flip-flop usage from the HLS code. 2. It can be observed that the logic delay in the HLS version is greater than that in the Verilog version. Therefore, HLS WNS < Verilog WNS, and HLS WHS > Verilog WHS. 3. WNS stands for worst setup time slack, which indicates how much time is remaining until the next positive edge after the computation is complete, in the worst-case scenario. 4. WHS stands for worst hold time slack, which represents how long the value will hold during the positive edge in the worst-case scenario. ###### tags: `serial2parallel` `lab sequential`